Without expected permanence, uncontrollable changes every day bring us both irritability and despair. The appearance of time gives us long-lost comfort including secure continuity and predictable logic. As for the reason of appearance, I think, is our memory. The alternation of seasons, growth of age, iterations of art, and transition of topography all remind us of comparison. Adding large- scale context with architecture, it’s one of endpoints of history where culture, identity, milieu, and evolution reciprocate. If it is not asserted as a source of the reflection in future, architecture is radically a successor or a practitioner. Nevertheless, a narrow scale background enables architecture convert into a place which is experiencing story and representing memory where time grows. If two types of context both were imposed onto architecture, the paradox would provoke its maximum historicity. It would be abundant and narrative.